Friday, May 17, 2013

From The News (Mexico City): Head of Profeco Benítez dismissed



Osorio Chong: Institution’s prestige was put at risk

BY CIRCE VARGÓN

The News

MEXICO CITY – Humberto Benítez Treviño, the head of Mexico’s Federal Consumer Protection Agency (Profeco), has been sacked over an incident in which the agency attempted to shut down a restaurant just hours after it refused to clear a table for Benítez Treviño’s daughter.

The Interior Secreteriat (Segob) announced on Wednesday that Benítez Treviño was removed as the head of the Profeco on the orders of President Enrique Peña Nieto.

Interior Secretary Miguel Ángel Osorio Chong said the move sent a clear message to the nation’s public servants that “in addition to doing our jobs within the law, we are obligated to act ethically and with absolute professionalism.”

On April 26, Benítez Treviño’s daughter, Andrea Benítez, arrived at the Maximo Bistrot restaurant in Mexico City’s upmarket Roma district and demanded an outside table.

Restaurant owner Gabriela López said that when Andrea Benítez was asked to wait for the table, she said to waiters, “Do you know who my father is?” and threatened to call the Profeco. Two hours later, inspectors from the Profeco arrived at the restaurant and attempted to shut it down for supposed “anomalies” in its reservations system.

The incident went viral on social networks, with users dubbing Andrea Benítez “Lady Profeco.”

Three days later, an official investigation was launched. Osorio Chong said that the investigation found that Benítez Treviño had not ordered the Profeco to shut down the restaurant, but the incident had nevertheless put the institution’s reputation at risk.



From Hispanic Business: Crossing Fee Idea Gets Halted at the Border



The Obama administration's proposal to study fees for crossing the land borders of the United States met a dead end at a congressional committee today thanks to Rep. Brian Higgins, D-Buffalo. 

The House Homeland Security Committee, by voice vote, approved Higgins' amendment blocking the Department of Homeland Security from studying such a border crossing fee, as Republicans and southern-border Democrats joined with Higgins to oppose the idea. 

"This is a huge victory for Western New York and other communities across the Northern Border that rely on the seamless flow of people and goods between the U.S. and Canada to support our economies," Higgins said. "The fee would have put an unfair burden on residents who frequently travel across the border and the cost of the proposed study would have taken resources, already stretched thin, away from significantly more critical security needs." 

The committee voted to attach Higgins amendment to a larger bill aimed at bolstering border security both at the northern and southern borders. 

And while that larger bill, if passed, would become likely become part of the larger congressional debate on immigration reform, the bipartisan support Higgins won for his amendment makes it more likely that his measure will survive as the bill moves forward. 

Collecting a fee on people crossing the U.S.-Canadian border and the U.S.-Mexican border would be counterproductive, other members of the committee said. 

"This kind of a fee would be so chilling on an economy that's trying to be on the rebound here," said Rep. Candice Miller, R-Mich. 



From Bloomberg: Mexico Economy Expanded Less Than Expected as Industry Contracts



Mexico’s economy grew less than analysts expected in the first three months of the year as industrial production contracted on slower-than-forecast growth in the U.S.
Gross domestic product in the first quarter rose 0.8 percent from the year-ago period, the slowest pace since the end of 2009. The gain was less than the 1.1 percent median estimate in a Bloomberg survey of 18 economists.
Economists are cutting their forecasts for growth in 2013 after the U.S. expanded less than expected in the first quarter, reinforcing bets that Mexico’s central bank will cut borrowing costs for a second time this year. The economy is growing at its slowest pace since GDP contracted 6.2 percent in 2009 in the aftermath of the Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. collapse.
The central bank unexpectedly cut its key rate by half a point to 4 percent on March 8, the first reduction in more than three years. The key rate was kept unchanged in April as inflation climbed above the central bank’s target range.
Six-month interest-rate swaps, which reflect traders’ expectations of monetary policy, have fallen 11 basis points, or 0.11 percentage point, to 4.17 percent at 8:35 a.m. local time since central bank Governor Agustin Carstens signaled in an April 29 radio interview that the bank may consider more interest-rate cuts should inflation ease.

Rate Cut

Carstens later said that the bank doesn’t hold a bias in either direction on rates. The swaps show traders assign a 68 percent probability that Banco de Mexico will cut rates by October. As recently as May 3, traders saw a 32 percent chance.
The economy expanded 0.5 percent from the previous quarter, an annualized rate of 1.83 percent. The median estimate from seven analysts surveyed by Bloomberg was for a 0.3 percent gain.
The peso weakened 0.4 percent to 12.3267 per dollar and has rallied 4.3 percent this year, the most among 16 major currencies tracked by Bloomberg. Yields on Mexican government notes due in 2024 fell one basis point to 4.61 percent.
Activity in industrial sectors such as mining, construction and industrial manufacturing contracted 1.5 percent in the January to March period from a year earlier.
Analysts have cut their forecasts for growth this year in each of the past three monthly surveys by the central bank, reducing the average estimate to 3.35 percent from 3.55 percent.
Annual inflation in Latin America’s second-biggest economy was 4.65 percent in April, above the nation’s 2 percent to 4 percent target range. Policy makers expect price increases to slow to below 4 percent in the second half of the year.
The U.S. economy, which buys about 80 percent of Mexico’s exports, grew an annualized 2.5 percent in the first quarter, less than the 3 percent forecast by analysts, and signs of weakness have persisted. Housing starts slumped to a five-month low in April and industrial production fell in the same month by the most since August.

Wednesday, May 15, 2013

From Bloomberg: Border Delays Cost US 7.8 Billion as Fence is Focus



Delays at U.S.-Mexico border crossings cost the U.S. economy $7.8 billion in 2011, as improvements have lagged behind traffic growth and the political focus has been on securing the rest of the border.
The toll could balloon to $14.7 billion annually if the value of U.S.-Mexico truck trade reaches $463 billion by 2020 as predicted, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
As the U.S. Senate debates an overhaul of the nation’s immigration system, the focus on fencing and securing remote stretches of the southern border has overshadowed long-needed improvements in technology, infrastructure and staffing at the land ports, said Matthew Hummer, a senior transportation analyst for Bloomberg Government.
“I think the most important issue here is stabilizing the two economies, and the ports of entry do that: They facilitate trade and create job opportunities,” said Hummer, the author of a Bloomberg Government report on the border. “If Mexicans have jobs in Mexico they are less likely to come to the U.S.”
Net Mexican migration dropped to zero from 2005 to 2010, amid strengthening economic conditions in Mexico, heightened border enforcement and other factors, according to a Pew Research Center study last year. The Mexican economy has grown at about twice the pace of the U.S. since the end of 2009.

Remote Areas

U.S. investment has remained focused on controlling the rest of the border between the crossings, including remote areas such as the Arizona desert. In the past decade, the number of Border Patrol agents more than doubled while the number of Customs and Border Protection officers, who staff the ports of entry, has remained at about the same level, according to a report by the Washington-based Woodrow Wilson Center’s Mexico Institute and partner institutions.
Congressional funding for the areas between the ports has eclipsed that for the authorized entry points since 2007, even though the crossings have faced enhanced security requirements, increasing trade and evidence that drugs and dangerous individuals are more likely to cross there, according to the Mexico Institute report.
That focus continues in the current immigration debate in the Senate. The plan crafted by the so-called Gang of Eight bipartisan senators, which is being considered by the Judiciary Committee today, aims to secure Republican support by tying immigrants’ path to citizenship to the ability of the U.S. Border Patrol to stop 90 percent of illegal traffic across the southern border between the official ports of entry. There is no similar metric for the efficiency or security of the land ports.

‘Less Attention’

“The way the border is currently run is costing the U.S. a lot in terms of jobs and the economy,” said Christopher Wilson, an associate with the Mexico Institute and co-author of his group’s report on border trade. “In the context of the current immigration debate, we are very focused on what is going on between the ports of entry while this major issue, which is about security but also about jobs and the economy, is getting a lot less attention.”
Focusing politically on the rest of the border is easier than facing the challenges of running effective ports of entry, said Steven Camarota, director of research for the Center for Immigration Studies, a Washington-based group critical of increased immigration. While the land ports probably do need more investment in infrastructure, there also should be much more stringent security, including entry and exit checks to catch those who overstay legal visits, he said.
“It seems to some extent we put too much emphasis on the ease of movement across the border,” Camarota said. “The border is not simply an obstacle to be overcome by businesses and travelers. It is the part where our country begins, and it is vitally important for security and immigration control.”

Modernizing Ports

Modernizing land ports of entry, which average more than 40 years old and were built before the increased security requirements implemented after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, would cost $6 billion according to a 2011 Customs and Border Protection report. About half of that cost would be for the southern border, according to the Bloomberg Government analysis.
The Senate bill includes funding for 3,500 additional Customs officers and earmarks $6.5 billion for border security. With the bill’s metrics tied to security elsewhere on the border, though, that’s where most of the money will probably go, Hummer said.
“Achieving the security metrics in the Gang of Eight bill will likely divert funds away from land ports of entry,” Hummer said.

Truck Crossing

More than 5.1 million trucks crossed the border at the six largest commercial ports of entry in 2012, up from about 2.9 million in 1995 and expected to swell to more than 7.3 million by 2020, according to the Bloomberg Government analysis. Over the last decade, the inflation-adjusted value of goods transported by truck through the southern border grew from $205 billion to $322 billion, Hummer said.
The average wait for commercial vehicles at the southern border is just over an hour and much longer at peak times of day, Hummer said. His analysis included additional costs of fuel and driver wages as well as lost business opportunities.
Five industries that account for 66 percent of trade value between the countries -- electrical machinery, computer devices, vehicles, plastics and precision health instruments --shouldered most of the costs of the border delays.
The delays could increase the costs of consumer electronics and complicate supply chains for automakers, including Honda, Nissan, Mazda and Audi, which have announced increased production in Mexico, according to the report. Automakers often ship parts across the southern border several times during manufacturing, causing costs to add up.

Economic Ties

The value of the economic ties between the U.S. and Mexico has been lost in the immigration debate amid calls by some members of Congress to fence the entire length of the nearly 2,000-mile border, said Benjamin Johnson, executive director of the American Immigration Council, a pro-immigration group based in Washington. The council’s Immigration Policy Center publisheda paper last week on the importance of trade between the countries called “Lost in the Shadow of the Fence.”
“We talk about fences, we talk about all kinds of security measures and almost never is there a discussion of how do you improve the incredibly valuable crossings in terms of trade and people that happen at the border,” Johnson said.
To contact the reporter on this story: Amanda J. Crawford in Phoenix at acrawford24@bloomberg.net

Friday, May 10, 2013

Happy Mother's Day and Feliz Dia de las Madres 2013

We would like to wish all the mothers  a wonderful  Feliz Dia de las Madres and a Happy Mother's Day.

Below is an interesting Yuma Sun article about how Mother's Day comes two times a year along the US/Mexican border.


Mother's Day comes around twice along the border

No matter that their mother passed away 20 years ago, Frances Murrietta and her siblings gather at her graveside in San Luis Rio Colorado, Son., every Mother's Day to honor her.

For them, Yolanda Sanchez de Valdez is alive in spirit and memory, if not in body.

“We sing to her, we bring her flowers,” said Murrietta.

Murrietta, the manager of the Somerton Library, planned to go to the cemetery across the border at the end of work Friday, since Mother's Day always falls on May 10 in Mexico, where her mother had lived.

But then Murrietta and her siblings and their families will gather again on Sunday for a potluck meal where they'll observe Mother's Day on the U.S. calendar.

In a border region where two nations' cultures and traditions mesh and mingle, Yuma-area residents whose roots go back to Mexico may opt for observing the holiday in Mexican custom or waiting for Sunday, or marking both days in a hybrid celebration of motherhood in keeping with the influences of both countries.

Visiting the grave of a departed mother on Mother's Day is common in Mexico. And while they live in United States, Murrietta says she and her siblings follow the same practice to honor their mother for instilling in them values they in turn have taught their own children.

“Though she's not near us, it's important to share the lessons that she taught us with our own children. Her foundations were so strong and unique. She continues to live for us in our hearts.”

In San Luis, Ariz., — where many residents are immigrants of Mexico or their children or grandchildren — “95 percent” of families will observe's Mexico's Mother's Day date, says Laura Sanchez, owner of Pro Evento, a party supply and venue provider.

A tradition in either country's celebration is to give flowers, and based on prior years' experience, Sanchez was expected to fill between 150 to 200 orders for floral arrangements in the days leading up to Friday.

While the father may be perceived as the stereotypical dominant figure in a Mexican or Latino family, said Sanchez, it is the mother who is the “pillar” for the children.

Father Javier Perez of Immaculate Conception Church agreed with Sanchez's analogy.

“There is no other love greater than a mother's,” said Perez, adding that the Mother's Day celebration carries huge symbolism in Mexico and in U.S. border communities.

Special Mother's Day masses will be offered Sunday at Immaculate Conception Church and the parishes of Immaculate Heart of Mary in Somerton and San Judas Tadeo on San Luis, Ariz., but the services will include a tradition from Mexico as “Las Mañanitas”.

Mañanitas are songs sung on birthdays and other holidays in Mexico, but families may also hire musicians to sing them as early morning serenades to wake up the mothers on Mother's Day.

Los Rezecos, a Yuma-based band that performs songs in a variety of Mexican musical genres, has been making the rounds among homes in Yuma and Somerton to sing Mother's Day mañanitas in each of the past 10 years.

For this year's celebration, the band planned to start at around 10 p.m. Thursday in Yuma, sing a set of three songs to the mothers of 20 to 25 households, then move on to Somerton, where it would visit a similar number of homes, Los Rezecos member Argel Garcia said. He figured that band would finish its rounds by about 5 or 6 Friday morning. 

The youngest members of the family were getting an opportunity of their own at Yuma County libraries to honor their mothers.

At the county library branch in San Luis, children were making tissue paper floral arrangements for their moms in a craft session, while in the Somerton library, they were making greeting cards.

“This is a good way to teach the children how to be creative using their own words and their own talents,” said Murrietta.

And the library sessions happened soon enough for the kids to finish their gifts in time for either Mother's Day.

Thursday, May 9, 2013

From Commercial Carriers Journal: Cross-border trucking pilot program heads back to court



Though a federal court ruled just three weeks ago in favor of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration and its cross-border trucking pilot program with Mexico, a different panel of judges heard separate oral arguments May 6 against both the cross-border program and the National Registry of Medical Examiners implemented last year by FMCSA.
The Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association argued in the March 15 court date — the ruling of which issued April 19 — that the participant carriers and drivers in the cross-border program are held to a lower standard than American drivers as far as safety and regulations. The court rejected the arguments.
The Registry of Medical Examiners will begin requiring interstate CDL holders to receive medical certification and physicals from examiners certified by FMCSA and listed in the registry. OOIDA’s arguments in the current case are that Mexican drivers in the program are not required to receive medical certification by an FMCSA-approved examiner.
FMCSA says it can only require Mexican and Canadian drivers to receive certification if Congress change or repeal prior agreements with the two countries regarding truck drivers entering the U.S. FMCSA says Congres has not indicated any plans to do so.
In the program’s first 18 months, 10 Mexican carriers have participated, and the agency has performed 935 inspections on their trucks. Participants have driven 283,279 miles in U.S. border states, with Texas leading with 163,120 miles. Arizona had the fewest of border states with 826 miles.
Florida led non-border states with 11,686 miles. Nearly 50,000 miles have been driven in non-border states.

From SeacoastOnline.com: Study of 'border-fee' a bad idea that should be abandoned



Growing up in Caribou, barely 10 miles from New Brunswick, I saw every day that on both sides of the U.S.-Canada border are the lifelong friends and family members, the shopping, medical services, churches, and all the other things that make a community. From Jackman to Fort Kent to Calais, Mainers understand the principle that, while America's borders must be closed to our enemies, they must always be open to our friends.
For that reason alone I and people throughout Maine were alarmed by the recent announcement that the Department of Homeland Security's proposed 2014 budget includes funding to study the feasibility and cost of instituting a fee for anyone crossing into our country by land — on foot, on a bike, or in a car — from Canada or Mexico. This is a bad idea that should be abandoned. And, as a senior member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, I have taken action to prevent scarce federal funds from being used for this ill-conceived purpose.
Any fee, no matter how small, would have a negative impact on the day-to-day commerce and travel between border communities. It would unduly penalize families who have relatives on either side of the border. In addition, it would damage relations between the United States and the neighbors that are vital trading partners. The Canadian ambassador told me that Canadians, too, are alarmed at the prospect of such a fee.
Maine's biggest trading partner, not surprisingly, is Canada. At the national level, too, America's biggest trading partner is Canada and Mexico is third. Our goal should be to enhance ties with our neighbors, not put what would be unnecessary barriers in place. In addition to our strong economic ties, we must preserve the friendships the United States enjoys with Canada and Mexico. Singling out our neighbors for a fee that would apply only to them would damage those relationships.
This fee would also hurt American border communities. According to the Maine International Trade Center, more than 300,000 people cross the U.S.-Canada border each day. Many American communities and businesses along the northern border rely on trade and tourism to power their economies, and imposing a land border fee on individuals would deter Canadians from visiting the United States. A decrease in tourism and travel would have a detrimental impact on these border communities. It would be truly ironic for the Department of Homeland Security, after investing significant taxpayer dollars in improving border facilities at such places as Calais, Van Buren and Jackman, to now adopt a policy that undoubtedly would cause a significant drop in their use.
While I recognize the difficult fiscal challenges facing the federal government, including the Department of Homeland Security, imposing a border crossing fee for individuals crossing the border over land is not a sustainable solution to our budgetary concerns. For that reason, I am asking my colleagues on the Appropriations Committee to join me in blocking this misguided proposal. Current federal law bars the U.S. Treasury and the attorney general from charging and collecting any fee for the immigration inspection and pre-inspection of passengers arriving over land at a U.S. port of entry whose journey originated in Canada or Mexico. This prohibition should be maintained.
One of the best examples of our special relationship with Canada is the "Hands Across the Border" summer festival, which demonstrates just how much the two municipalities of Calais, Maine, and St. Stephen, New Brunswick, truly are one community. We must not permit the hands of friendship from becoming hands demanding payment.